The Science is Settled? (Yes, more global warming)

I've talked about global warming before on this blog. As I've said before, I don't doubt that the climate is changing. But it has always changed. And who suddenly decided that the temperature in, say, 1970 was the perfect temperature, the temperature that we should strive to maintain forever?

Furthermore, I have not seen any proof, not even a credible theory, that explains how we humans are causing this global warming catastrophe. Think that is too harsh? Recall my "Global Warming?" post back on April 14, 2010. My main point in that post was that "warmists" have never demonstrated to me the accuracy of their models. Anyone can claim any damn thing--but do you back it up with proof? They don't even try. They just trot out the latest model, sound the alarms, and ask for drastic changes in our lifestyle (and more funding).

With that in mind, I would like to share an old climate warming study scorecard that I stumbled across the other day. Check it out, and think about it when you hear about the next global warming study trumpeted by the press.

From Warwickhughes.com:
"Greenhouse Warming Scorecard (Updated 4/2/2006)"
http://www.warwickhughes.com/hoyt/scorecard.htm

Simply amazing just how many of these studies were wrong. Amazing, but not surprising. That's what happens when you do science wrong, when you don't verify your base case. Any engineer doing a power system harmonics study knows that. Maybe someday the warmists will figure it out, too.