Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Rodgers versus Favre





As a Green Bay Packer fan, I have had the pleasure of watching Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers play quarterback. Incredible to watch, both of them.

It wasn't always so, not for me anyway. Consider this list of Packer quarterbacks, from Wikipedia.
"List of Green Bay Packers starting quarterbacks"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Green_Bay_Packers_starting_quarterbacks

I missed the Bart Starr days, unfortunately, although I remember Starr showing up at many Packer functions at the Pfister Hotel when I worked as a banquet waiter there. Always amazed me what good shape he was in considering how long ago his playing days had ended.

Anyway, I never watched Starr play live, only on film. The first Packer quarterback I remember watching was Lynn Dickey. Dickey could throw the ball, and I still remember the Monday Night Football shootout versus the Redskins in 1983, just an amazing game.

After Dickey there was a very forgettable group including David Whitehurst, Randy Wright, Anthony Dilweg, and many others. Very frustrating watching the Packers in those years. I remember nothing but draw plays on third and long, essentially giving up. Pathetic.

The one bright spot, before Favre, was Don Majkowski. Majkowski could really play, but his career was ended by a shoulder injury. Well, he came back after the injury but he was never really the same, unfortunately.

And then came Brett Favre. What else can I say about Favre. Lots of great plays, and lots of ... interesting plays, too! Favre was a fierce competitor. When Warren Sapp or John Randle would knock him down, he would come back twice as determined.

Randle, in particular, had an interesting rivalry with Favre. From Wikipedia:
"To play off the rivalry with Brett Favre, Randle starred in a commercial which featured himself sewing a miniature version of Favre's #4 jersey which he put on a live chicken. The commercial then showed Randle chasing the chicken around what was supposed to be Randle's backyard and ended with Randle cooking chicken on his BBQ, leading to fierce protests from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals."
I remember that commercial well. It was hilarious.

We Packer fans were worried when Favre left. How can you replace a player like Brett Favre. Compounding our concern was (is?) the fact that Aaron Rodgers was quite frail. In the limited action he saw during the Favre era, it seemed like he would get hurt every time he stepped on the field.

I should add that I'm not an overly emotional Packer fan like those who either hate the Packers for pushing Favre out the door or hate Favre for not being loyal to the Packers (whatever that means). Point is: I can see the Packers' point of view. Rodgers was ready to play and Favre was not willing to be a backup. Tough, but that's the nature of competitive sports. I can also see Favre's point of view: I'd play as long as I could, too, even if it ultimately meant going to a hated rival like the Viqueens.

Well, so far so good in the Rodgers era (knock on wood). Although I realize I'm probably jinxing him now just by writing this (just before the NY Giants game on December 4th). I simply can't believe how well he played last year, and he's doing even better so far this year. Just amazing.


What prompted me to reminisce like this? It was an article I saw on ESPN.com:
"It's Mr. Rodgers' neighborhood now" by Rick Reilly
http://espn.go.com/espn/story/_/id/7272995/rick-reilly-rodgers-better-favre

Reilly is a very good writer, and I really enjoy reading his articles. But I can't agree here that one must be either a Favre guy or a Rodgers guy. I happen to be both, I appreciate both. I won't choose between them.

The article makes a number of good points, though:

"Rodgers picks his spots better than Favre ever did. Favre always figured a football could fit easily into a USB port from 40 yards away. Not Rodgers. He knows the value of a perfectly thrown spiral to a cheerleader."

"On prime-time TV, Favre is the gutsy cop who wants to throw a grenade and go running in after it to save hostages. Rodgers is the guy in the bow tie who talks it out on the headset with the kidnapper, all the while cleaning his rifle scope with his pocket square."


This I disagree with, totally:
"You really have to go a ways to cause a little town like Green Bay -- a place where football is the side dish served with every meal -- to turn against you, yet Brett Favre did it.
People are always emotional at first. Green Bay does not hate Brett Favre. Time heals little spats like this. Whatever was said when Favre left Green Bay will be forgotten and only the good memories will remain. Favre's battles with Sapp and Randle. The Super Bowl win, and loss. The crazy celebration after Favre's early touchdown pass in the Super Bowl, when he took off his helmet and ran around like crazy. All the great wins at a snowy Lambeau Field. That's how I'll remember him.


Reilly makes up for his mistakes in the final lines of the article, though, which are pure genius.
"'Oh, yeah?' Favre men usually say. 'If Green Bay doesn't love Brett Favre, why is there a Brett Favre Pass in town?'"
"To which we Rodgers men say, 'Wait a couple of years. Soon you'll be driving on the Aaron Rodgers Championship Beltway. You'll like it. It's safe, smooth and takes you where you want to go.'"